Occasionally I pick up a book with a different lifestyle
featured. A book about gay men (mm) for instance, or a ménage (three people in
a relationship together). I enjoy them if they’re done well, and the way the
characters cope with their dilemma. They make a change. But I’ve seen these
books called anachronistic when they have a historical setting.
They might be, but the premise is not.
There have always been people who need something different. However,
right up until the Georgian era, homosexuality, or to be more precise, sodomy,
was illegal, punishable by death.
There were prosecutions, but most of them weren’t for the “crime”
itself, but for something else, like creating trouble, and in a fascinating
series of prosecutions and executions in the 1720’s, they were associated with
a Jacobite spy ring. At the time the Jacobites were closely allied with the
French, who were happy to use the exiled royals as pawns in a bigger game. And there
was a faction in British, or more precisely, the English, who distrusted and
disliked the French.
When I revised “Tom Jones” last year I was careful not to
add too much French language to my revisions, because Fielding was a Tory, a
member of the French-distrusting group. So “unnatural practices” were
associated with the French, as can be seen in some of the slang of the period. However
the French referred to corporal punishment for sexual titillation as “The
English Disease,” so the feeling seems to have been mutual!
Back to the gays. They always existed, but when the
punishment was to be hanged, there was little to be gained in “coming out.” So they
married, had children, but also had boyfriends, or they went to houses where
they could meet with others of the same inclination. Unfortunately, driving
them underground put them in the same bracket as true criminals in many people’s
eyes, and thus the confusion with spying and even murder.
Here’s the most famous case from this time, Mother Clap. A window
into the past.
“Margaret Clap was indicted for keeping a House in which she
procur'd and encourag'd Persons to commit Sodomy , on the 10th of
December last and before and after.
Samuel Stevens thus depos'd. On Sunday Night the 14th of
November. I went to the Prisoners House in Field-Lane, Holbourn . I found
near Men Fifty there, making Love to one another as they call'd it. Sometimes
they'd sit in one anothers Laps, use their Hands indecently Dance and make
Curtsies and mimick the Language of Women - O Sir! - Pray Sir! - Dear Sir! Lord
how can ye serve me so! - Ah ye little dear Toad! Then they'd go by Couples,
into a Room on the same Floor to be marry'd as they call'd it. The Door at that
Room was kept by - Ecclestone to prevent any body from balking their
Diversions. - When they came out, they used to brag in plain Terms, of what
they had been doing, and the Prisoner was present all the Time, except when she
went out to fetch Liquors. There was - Griffin among them, who was since hang'd
for Sodomy. - And Derwin who had been carried before Sir George Martins
for Sodomitical Practices with a Link Boy, he brag'd how he had baffled the
Link Boy's Evidence and the Prisoner boasted that what she had said before Sir
George, in Derwin's Favour, was a great Means of bringing him off. - I went
thither 2 or 3 Sundays following, and found much the same Practices as before.
They talk'd all manner of the and most vile Obscenity in her Presence, and she
appear'd wonderfully pleas'd with it.
Joseph Sellers depos'd to the same Purpose and added he
believ'd there were above 40 Sodomies commited that Night.
The Prisoner in her Defence, said that Darwin was taken up
only for a Quarrel and that it ought to be considered, that she was a Woman,
and therefore it could not be thought that she would ever be concern'd in such
abonsinable Practices. But the Evidence being full and positive, the Jury found
her Guilty .”
Plus ca change, plus ca meme chose.
2 comments:
Fascinating and unusual post, Lynne. I was interested in Derwin's phrase 'bringing him off.' In context, it could either mean that it helped him gain his freedom when he was taken up for 'Sodomistical practices with a link boy' or it could be a slang phrase for causing him to ejaculate.
I looked up 'bring off' in my Dictionary of Historical Slang. It defines 'bring off' as 'inducing an orgasm' and it dates from the 16h century!
Thanks, Elizabeth! I never realised that was what it meant! The Old Bailey site has been a big time-suck the past few days, fascinating cases listed there! Interesting that nobody of note was had up in the magistrate's court for this "crime."
Post a Comment