Covent Garden Today |
There’s a house that features in most of my mid-Georgian set
books, which the owner calls “The best whorehouse in London.” In order not to
violate the terms of the contracts I sign, sometimes it’s run by Mrs. Brown,
and sometimes she has another name.
Mrs. Brown is a bit of an enigma. She dresses garishly
during business hours, but prefers something a bit practical and more tasteful
in her own time. She has a broad Cockney accent but when she forgets, it
becomes a bit more refined. Not that she’s a countess in hiding or anything,
but it’s obvious to anyone who knows her that she’s not as “common” as she
claims to be.
In fact, during this era there was a real Mrs. Brown who ran
a whorehouse in Covent Garden, but her brothel was in one of the lean-tos by
the market, not one of the grander houses that ring the square.
Covent Garden has an interesting history. It was built to
house the aristocracy but by the time it was ready the really posh nobs were
moving out to the West End, so it never caught on, but it did become the
theatre district, with Drury Lane and the Opera House within spitting distance
of each other. That was where the young bloods went when they wanted a bit of
action. The green rooms in the theatres, which often acted as unofficial
brothels, private houses that contained whores running themselves and the
brothels, where many girls were run. There was a House of Correction, which
specialised in the “English Vice,” ie flogging and early sado-masochistic
practices (not really BDSM, as it didn’t have the conventions and rules we
associate with that term).
Hogarth depicted a scene of debauchery in “The Rake’s
Progress.” Hogarth was a member of a distinctive group that included the
Fieldings of Bow Street, so his engravings, showing the anti-French,
anti-Jacobite view they shared have a particular point of view not necessarily
shared with everyone in society. But there are real people depicted in his
painting, apparently.
The first time I saw the original of “The Rake’s Progress” I
was astounded. Not just because of the paintings themselves, but their
situation. They’re in Sir John Soane’s house, somewhere everyone should see
before they die. The house is packed. Top to bottom, every tiny crack and cranny,
packed with statues, plaster casts, fragments and paintings. “The Rake’s
Progress” is kept in an amazing room and it opens like a book so the viewer can
see all eight paintings without it taking up too much wall space.
Anyway, I digress. I went to Covent Garden, had a good look
and chose a house that I wanted for my brothel. It’s on the corner of King
Street, a prime postion, near the site of Button’s Coffee House, which is now,
appropriately, a Starbucks. Gentlemen went to the coffee house to discuss
politics, finance, insurance, and in Button’s, the arts. Similarly, the
brothels weren’t just for sex. They held gaming rooms, some of them hells (high
stakes and sometimes card sharps), they’d have shows of lascivious activity,
some with wit and style, some just sleazy, and rooms where men could drink
themselves to oblivion and then choose their woman for an hour or two.
Note, I said “men.” Respectable women never set foot in
those houses, or so the historians would have us believe. However, they
discover new things every day. Was there a similar establishment for women? Maybe
a bit more discreet, a little more refined?
We can never be absolutely sure, can we?
But look for Mrs. Brown’s in my upcoming release, the first
book in a new series set in the thrilling, full-bodied, Georgian era. More about
it nearer release, but I am really excited to be revisiting my favourite
historical period.
3 comments:
What an enjoyable post, Lynne!
There was a discreet meeting house in the 1860s for ladies and gentlemen of the ton at nos 26-28 Burlington Arcade, run by the astute Madame Parsons, milliner, specializing in guinea bonnets, whose shop was downstairs.
Burlington Arcade was built 1815-19by Samuel Ware and some of the shops had a suite of rooms above - as at nos 26-28. I see no reason why it shouldn't have had the same convenient function in the Regency period.
A fascinating post, Lynne. I enjoyed your comment too, Elizabeth. As most marriages of the period were contracted for financial or dynastic reasons, the enterprising Madame Parsons was generously - for a small consideration - facilitating romance!
My thoughts exactly, Jane!
Post a Comment